Final week’s ballot means that Samsung’s new mid-range trio, the Galaxy A56, A36 and A26, are going through two main points – the {hardware} is nice however not nice and the costs are too excessive.
That may very well be considered a single concern since each issues plug into the value-for-money equation, however the outcome is identical – folks don’t really feel like they’re getting their cash’s value with these A-series telephones.
Let’s begin with the Samsung Galaxy A56. It’s fairly clear that most individuals wish to see a reduction earlier than contemplating this telephone. It begins at $500/€480 and you’ll simply discover a Galaxy S24 FE for that cash. Samsung steadily stripped out the three.5mm headphone jack and now the microSD slot too. And it nonetheless hasn’t added a telephoto digital camera or a higher-end chipset with extra RAM (12GB is restricted to solely choose areas). So why not get the S24 FE?
The Samsung Galaxy A36 is cheaper and we see fewer folks asking for a reduction – but in addition fewer folks within the telephone basically. The truth is, going by this ballot, extra folks need the A56 than the A36.
The Samsung Galaxy A26 acquired a blended reception. Some see it as one of the best value-for-money choice, others name it a recycled design. So, whereas it might discover a couple of followers, the polls present that it’ll lose out to the Galaxy A36 and A56 when it comes to recognition.
The 2024 era of the Galaxy A-series was often featured in our weekly offers articles and we count on the 2025 fashions to do the identical. It’d take a couple of months – the trio nonetheless has that “new telephone” scent – however reductions are on the best way. Possibly then folks will change their opinions on the A26, A36 and A56.
