- The New York Occasions is requesting that every one ChatGPT conversations be retained as a part of its lawsuit in opposition to OpenAI and Microsoft
- This may imply {that a} report of all of your ChatGPT conversations could be stored, doubtlessly ceaselessly
- OpenAI argues that chats with AI must be a personal dialog
Again in December 2023, the New York Occasions launched a lawsuit in opposition to OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging copyright infringement. The New York Occasions alleges that OpenAI had skilled its ChatGPT mannequin, which additionally powers Microsoft’s Copilot, by “copying and utilizing hundreds of thousands” of its articles with out permission.
The lawsuit remains to be ongoing, and as a part of it the New York Occasions (and different plaintiffs concerned within the case) have made the demand that OpenAI are made to retain client ChatGPT and API buyer information indefinitely, a lot to the ire of Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, who took to X.com to tweet, “We’ve got been pondering just lately in regards to the want for one thing like ‘AI privilege’; this actually accelerates the necessity to have the dialog. IMO speaking to an AI must be like speaking to a lawyer or a physician. I hope society will determine this out quickly.”
just lately the NYT requested a courtroom to power us to not delete any consumer chats. we expect this was an inappropriate request that units a nasty precedent.we’re interesting the choice.we are going to combat any demand that compromises our customers’ privateness; it is a core precept.June 6, 2025
OpenAI describes the New York Occasions lawsuit as “baseless”, and in a prolonged publish on the OpenAI web site titled, ‘How we’re responding to The New York Occasions’ information calls for with a view to shield consumer privateness’, OpenAI lays out its method to privateness.
Brad Lightcap, COO, OpenAI, says that the demand from the NYT “basically conflicts with the privateness commitments we’ve got made to our customers. It abandons long-standing privateness norms and weakens privateness protections.”
Personal investigations
As increasingly more folks share intimate particulars of their lives with AI chatbots, which are sometimes taking up the function of a therapist, I can respect the necessity to have the ability to preserve AI conversations personal, nevertheless, I may also see the NYT’s perspective that if there may be proof that helps its claims in opposition to OpenAI then it must have entry to that information with out OpenAI with the ability to declare all of it as too personal to share.
RelatedPosts
For the time being, a ChatGPT chat is eliminated out of your account instantly if you delete the dialog, and scheduled for everlasting deletion from OpenAI methods inside 30 days. The order would imply that even deleted ChatGPT conversations must be retained by OpenAI.
As a ChatGPT consumer myself, I’ve all the time appreciated the flexibility to have the ability to take away conversations fully. If OpenAI is compelled to adjust to this request, then it’s going to have an effect on just about all people who makes use of the service, on both a free, Plus, Professional, or Groups (however not Enterprise or Edu account holders).
The order additionally doesn’t impression API prospects who’re utilizing Zero Information Retention endpoints below OpenAI’s ZDR modification.
OpenAI has mentioned it has appealed the order to the District Courtroom Decide and can inform us when it is aware of extra.
You may additionally like
