In short: The US Federal Commerce Fee has spent weeks investigating Microsoft’s cybersecurity offers with the federal authorities. Though the case’s destiny underneath the incoming Trump administration stays unsure, the Fee continues to pursue it, illuminating the tech large’s alleged technique of locking authorities prospects into its merchandise to dam competitors.
Microsoft has acquired a subpoena to show info over to the US Federal Commerce Fee amid accusations of anticompetitive conduct. The corporate’s wide-ranging cybersecurity settlement with a number of federal companies might violate antitrust regulation.
The investigation follows a ProPublica report detailing how the agency satisfied the federal government to transform a lot of its digital infrastructure to Microsoft merchandise after the 2020 SolarWinds cyberattack. The corporate is accused of bypassing the standard contract bidding course of, sticking federal prospects with costly subscription charges, and rendering migration to opponents like Google or Amazon prohibitively tough.
Following SolarWinds, the White Home summoned the heads of Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and different huge tech names to debate methods for bettering US cybersecurity. In response, Microsoft provided to assist numerous authorities sectors improve to its highest-quality safety merchandise.
Though utilizing Microsoft’s cybersecurity programs was initially free, steep subscription costs have been triggered as soon as the trial intervals ended. By this level, the quite a few divisions utilizing Microsoft’s merchandise, together with the army, had turn out to be so accustomed to them that they paid as a substitute of switching.
As reported final month, Microsoft’s cloud enterprise, Azure, is a main focus of the FTC’s investigation. Federal divisions that switched to the corporate’s platform ultimately purchased extra merchandise that ran on Azure. A former Microsoft salesperson in contrast the method to getting a buyer hooked on crack.
Critics argue that the association makes the federal government too depending on Microsoft, locking out opponents and rising the potential for a cascade of safety failures. A standard spherical of bidding adopted by a heterogeneous safety coverage may need lowered costs and boosted cybersecurity resilience.
Furthermore, the SolarWinds hack occurred as a consequence of a vulnerability in Microsoft’s software program. The corporate claimed that its increased subscription tiers would have prevented the incident, but it surely had ignored warnings concerning the flaw years earlier.
Some suspect that Microsoft’s free trials may quantity to unlawful gratuities, however the firm considers it a “100% low cost” added to pre-existing contracts. Assuming the FTC’s investigation survives into the oncoming administration, clearly defining the phrases of the deal may show to be a focus of the case.
In short: The US Federal Commerce Fee has spent weeks investigating Microsoft’s cybersecurity offers with the federal authorities. Though the case’s destiny underneath the incoming Trump administration stays unsure, the Fee continues to pursue it, illuminating the tech large’s alleged technique of locking authorities prospects into its merchandise to dam competitors.
Microsoft has acquired a subpoena to show info over to the US Federal Commerce Fee amid accusations of anticompetitive conduct. The corporate’s wide-ranging cybersecurity settlement with a number of federal companies might violate antitrust regulation.
The investigation follows a ProPublica report detailing how the agency satisfied the federal government to transform a lot of its digital infrastructure to Microsoft merchandise after the 2020 SolarWinds cyberattack. The corporate is accused of bypassing the standard contract bidding course of, sticking federal prospects with costly subscription charges, and rendering migration to opponents like Google or Amazon prohibitively tough.
Following SolarWinds, the White Home summoned the heads of Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and different huge tech names to debate methods for bettering US cybersecurity. In response, Microsoft provided to assist numerous authorities sectors improve to its highest-quality safety merchandise.
Though utilizing Microsoft’s cybersecurity programs was initially free, steep subscription costs have been triggered as soon as the trial intervals ended. By this level, the quite a few divisions utilizing Microsoft’s merchandise, together with the army, had turn out to be so accustomed to them that they paid as a substitute of switching.
As reported final month, Microsoft’s cloud enterprise, Azure, is a main focus of the FTC’s investigation. Federal divisions that switched to the corporate’s platform ultimately purchased extra merchandise that ran on Azure. A former Microsoft salesperson in contrast the method to getting a buyer hooked on crack.
Critics argue that the association makes the federal government too depending on Microsoft, locking out opponents and rising the potential for a cascade of safety failures. A standard spherical of bidding adopted by a heterogeneous safety coverage may need lowered costs and boosted cybersecurity resilience.
Furthermore, the SolarWinds hack occurred as a consequence of a vulnerability in Microsoft’s software program. The corporate claimed that its increased subscription tiers would have prevented the incident, but it surely had ignored warnings concerning the flaw years earlier.
Some suspect that Microsoft’s free trials may quantity to unlawful gratuities, however the firm considers it a “100% low cost” added to pre-existing contracts. Assuming the FTC’s investigation survives into the oncoming administration, clearly defining the phrases of the deal may show to be a focus of the case.
