Know-how Reporter

A girl from Dunfermline has spoken of her shock after an Apple voice-to-text service mistakenly inserted a reference to intercourse – and an obvious insult – right into a message left by a storage.
Louise Littlejohn, 66, obtained a voicemail message on Wednesday from a Lookers Land Rover storage in Motherwell inviting her to an occasion.
A synthetic intelligence (AI) powered service provided by Apple turned it right into a textual content message which – to her shock – requested if she been “capable of have intercourse” earlier than calling her a “piece of ****”.
Mrs Littlejohn advised BBC Information: “Initially I used to be shocked – astonished – however then I assumed that’s so humorous. The textual content was clearly fairly inappropriate.
“The storage is making an attempt to promote automobiles, and as a substitute of that they’re leaving insulting messages with out even being conscious of it. It’s not their fault in any respect.”
Apple and the storage each declined to remark.
An skilled has advised the BBC the AI system might have struggled partly due to the caller’s Scottish accent, however much more doubtless elements had been the background noise on the storage and the very fact he was studying off a script.

Mrs Littlejohn stated she initially thought the decision was a rip-off, however then recognised that the related quantity was from the Motherwell space.
She had purchased a automobile from the identical storage a couple of years in the past.
The BBC has listened to the audio left by the storage employee and confirmed it was a standard enterprise name.
The transcription is so jumbled it is onerous to decipher the place it went unsuitable, however the reference to “intercourse” might have in truth been when the caller talked about the “sixth” of March.
The BBC has eliminated the title of the storage worker:
“Hello Mrs Littlejohn, it’s ____ right here from Lookers Land Rover in Lanarkshire. I hope you’re nicely. Only a wee name to see when you have obtained your invite to our new automobile INAUDIBLE occasion that we do have on between the sixth and tenth of March.
“Only a wee name to see whether it is one thing you had been seeking to come alongside to, and to see if we will affirm an appointment slot that might be appropriate for your self. Whether it is one thing you’ll be keen on, be happy to offer me a name on ____, ask for myself ____ INAUDIBLE. Thanks.”
What went unsuitable?
On Apple’s web site, it particulars how their voicemail transcription is restricted to voicemails in English obtained on an iPhone with iOS 10 working system or later, and the transcription “depends upon the standard of the recording”.
Peter Bell, a professor of speech know-how on the College of Edinburgh, listened to the message left for Mrs Littlejohn.
He prompt it was on the “difficult finish for speech-to-text engines to cope with”.
He believes there are a variety of things which may have resulted in rogue transcription:
- The very fact it’s over the phone and, due to this fact, tougher to listen to
- There may be some background noise within the name
- The best way the storage employee speaks is like he’s studying a ready script somewhat than talking in a pure approach
“All of these elements contribute to the system doing badly, ” he added. “The larger query is why it outputs that form of content material.
“If you’re producing a speech-to-text system that’s being utilized by the general public, you’ll suppose you’ll have safeguards for that form of factor.”
Did a Scottish accent make a distinction?

Many individuals in Scotland will bear in mind a sketch from the BBC comedy present Burnistoun, when two Scottish males get trapped after the voice-activated raise cannot perceive their accents.
It has a whole bunch of thousands and thousands of views on-line, and tapped into a sense some Scots have about voice know-how.
In 2016, Scots had been requested to work with voice recognition know-how in a bid to assist cellphones decipher the accent higher.
For Prof Bell, the Scottish accent might have had an impression right here together with all different elements, however – with superb audio situations – issues that know-how may have with the Scottish accent are “a factor of the previous”.
Nevertheless, this not the primary time that Apple’s speech instruments have just lately hit the headlines for the unsuitable causes.
A couple of weeks in the past, the tech big stated it was working to repair its speech-to-text instrument after some social media customers discovered that once they spoke the phrase “racist” into their iPhones it typed it out as “Trump”.
Apple additionally suspended its AI summaries of stories headlines after it displayed false notifications on tales.
Know-how Reporter

A girl from Dunfermline has spoken of her shock after an Apple voice-to-text service mistakenly inserted a reference to intercourse – and an obvious insult – right into a message left by a storage.
Louise Littlejohn, 66, obtained a voicemail message on Wednesday from a Lookers Land Rover storage in Motherwell inviting her to an occasion.
A synthetic intelligence (AI) powered service provided by Apple turned it right into a textual content message which – to her shock – requested if she been “capable of have intercourse” earlier than calling her a “piece of ****”.
Mrs Littlejohn advised BBC Information: “Initially I used to be shocked – astonished – however then I assumed that’s so humorous. The textual content was clearly fairly inappropriate.
“The storage is making an attempt to promote automobiles, and as a substitute of that they’re leaving insulting messages with out even being conscious of it. It’s not their fault in any respect.”
Apple and the storage each declined to remark.
An skilled has advised the BBC the AI system might have struggled partly due to the caller’s Scottish accent, however much more doubtless elements had been the background noise on the storage and the very fact he was studying off a script.

Mrs Littlejohn stated she initially thought the decision was a rip-off, however then recognised that the related quantity was from the Motherwell space.
She had purchased a automobile from the identical storage a couple of years in the past.
The BBC has listened to the audio left by the storage employee and confirmed it was a standard enterprise name.
The transcription is so jumbled it is onerous to decipher the place it went unsuitable, however the reference to “intercourse” might have in truth been when the caller talked about the “sixth” of March.
The BBC has eliminated the title of the storage worker:
“Hello Mrs Littlejohn, it’s ____ right here from Lookers Land Rover in Lanarkshire. I hope you’re nicely. Only a wee name to see when you have obtained your invite to our new automobile INAUDIBLE occasion that we do have on between the sixth and tenth of March.
“Only a wee name to see whether it is one thing you had been seeking to come alongside to, and to see if we will affirm an appointment slot that might be appropriate for your self. Whether it is one thing you’ll be keen on, be happy to offer me a name on ____, ask for myself ____ INAUDIBLE. Thanks.”
What went unsuitable?
On Apple’s web site, it particulars how their voicemail transcription is restricted to voicemails in English obtained on an iPhone with iOS 10 working system or later, and the transcription “depends upon the standard of the recording”.
Peter Bell, a professor of speech know-how on the College of Edinburgh, listened to the message left for Mrs Littlejohn.
He prompt it was on the “difficult finish for speech-to-text engines to cope with”.
He believes there are a variety of things which may have resulted in rogue transcription:
- The very fact it’s over the phone and, due to this fact, tougher to listen to
- There may be some background noise within the name
- The best way the storage employee speaks is like he’s studying a ready script somewhat than talking in a pure approach
“All of these elements contribute to the system doing badly, ” he added. “The larger query is why it outputs that form of content material.
“If you’re producing a speech-to-text system that’s being utilized by the general public, you’ll suppose you’ll have safeguards for that form of factor.”
Did a Scottish accent make a distinction?

Many individuals in Scotland will bear in mind a sketch from the BBC comedy present Burnistoun, when two Scottish males get trapped after the voice-activated raise cannot perceive their accents.
It has a whole bunch of thousands and thousands of views on-line, and tapped into a sense some Scots have about voice know-how.
In 2016, Scots had been requested to work with voice recognition know-how in a bid to assist cellphones decipher the accent higher.
For Prof Bell, the Scottish accent might have had an impression right here together with all different elements, however – with superb audio situations – issues that know-how may have with the Scottish accent are “a factor of the previous”.
Nevertheless, this not the primary time that Apple’s speech instruments have just lately hit the headlines for the unsuitable causes.
A couple of weeks in the past, the tech big stated it was working to repair its speech-to-text instrument after some social media customers discovered that once they spoke the phrase “racist” into their iPhones it typed it out as “Trump”.
Apple additionally suspended its AI summaries of stories headlines after it displayed false notifications on tales.